Indiana OSHA 300
February 28th, 2007 Posted by AmeliaRegardless of which state you live in, by law there should be an OSHA 300 form posted at your place of employment. This unglamorous little poster actually serves a great purpose. It lists all the accidents, injuries and work-related illnesses in the past year. The goal is to prevent future injures.
Under state law, each employer is required to post an Indiana OSHA 300 form from February 1 to April 30 of each year. The 2007 OSHA 300 form recaps work-related illnesses and injuries that occurred at the company in the 2006 calendar year.
Indiana is one of 22 states that have opted out of the federal OSHA program. Instead, the state has its own worker safety organization, INOSHA or Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration. In general, INOSHA policies mirror those of the federal OSHA, although there are some differences. The following states have approved state OSHA plans: Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
How do you know you are protected under a state OSHA plan? Under federal regulations, each state OSHA plan must have job safety and health standards that are “at least as effective as” comparable federal OSHA standards. So, as a worker you know that you’re safe under a state plan. Most states adopt standards identical to federal ones, so there isn’t a huge difference. However, some states including California have exercised the option to promulgate standards covering hazards not addressed by the federal OSHA standards.
You may be as surprised as I was to learn that three states have state OSHA plans that cover state and local government employees only. These states are Connecticut, New Jersey and New York, plus the Virgin Islands, which is technically not a state.
In those states, businesses, federal agencies, and non-profit organizations are covered by the federal OSHA. Several states, including Kansas, once had state OSHA plans but now fall under federal OSHA jurisdiction.
Last 10 posts by Amelia
- EEOC Updates Definition of ADA Disability - April 20th, 2011
- New Utah Immigration Law - April 15th, 2011
- Drunk Employees Not Protected by ADA - April 13th, 2011
- 18 States Consider Limits on Use of Credit Reports in Screening - March 30th, 2011
- California May Expand Employee Rights - March 18th, 2011
- New I-9 Handbook - March 4th, 2011
- Reporting Time Pay Varies By State - February 18th, 2011
- Inclement Weather and Payroll - February 9th, 2011
- Avoid Workplace Violence - February 4th, 2011
- Rhode Island Governor Repeals E-Verify - January 26th, 2011
RELATED LINKS
POPULAR POSTS
- Home page
- State Lunch and Break Law Governing Florida
- California Lunch and Break Law Regulations
- North Carolina Labor Law Board
- Arizona Labor Law Board
More Popular Posts- Illinois State Lunch and Break Law Requirements
- Ohio Lunch and Break Law Requirements
- Server Minimum Wage
- Holiday Pay Law Requirements in the State of California (CA)
- Texas Minimum Wage Increase
- State Lunch and Break Law Governing Texas
- State of Michigan Lunch and Break Law
- Georgia Lunch and Break Law Regulations
- Arizona Lunch and Break Law
- Florida (FL) Maternity Leave Law
POPULAR TAGS
CATEGORIES
AUTHORS
- Adrianne Dunne
- Alexandra Waldron
- Amelia Figueroa
- Ashley Crawford
- Bethany Stroh
- Cara Lawrence
- Christine Carter
- Derrick Lange
- Emily Richardson
- Hannah Dixon
- Heather Connors
- Jane Morgan
- Jared Franklin
- John Bellamy
- Jolie Beckett
- Justine Murchie
- Karen Husson
- Kimberly Matthews
- Lindsay Ross
- Madison Thomas
- Marilyn Walters
- Mark Hathaway
- Nicole Andrade
- Rachel Maguire
- Sarah Fitzgerald
- Savannah Case
- Susan Symthe
ARCHIVES
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
-
Additional Archives - December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- August 2003
- August 2002
- April 2002
- February 2002
