Whistleblower Protection Changes
June 10th, 2007 Posted by MarkNormally under the new laws surrounding Sarbanes Oxley and the laws that make it so that companies must be as upfront and open with regulators
and the SEC as possible, employees who blow the whistle, so to speak, on illegal behavior, get protected from their employers later.
However, under the decision by a Michigan court, it seems those Sarbanes Oxley whistle blower protections only extend to employees of a publicly traded company, or one whose has stock and has their stock on the Nasdaq, the New York stock exchange, or some other stock market. The instance of the Michigan trial is even more interesting because the company where the whistle blower acted was actually the private subsidiary of a publicly traded company.
The employee had been a supervisor in the subsidiary’s engineering departments, but in 2004, he claimed that he was discriminated against because of his national origin. After that, he then claimed that his employer had retaliated against him because of the fact that he made the discrimination claim. He said that his employer did not promote him as they normally would have had he not claimed discrimination, and he said they actually demoted him because of it.
The Michigan court, however, clearly came down on the side of the employer, saying that the federal law as it stands now does not keep employees of private companies in its view. Does that mean that employers should throw all their Equal Employment Opportunity Commission posters, or EEOC posters, in the trash, and begin discriminating against employees of national origins, races, genders, hair colors, and skin complexions that they don’t like? No, of course not.
And the case is only in Michigan. So employers outside of this state have yet to hear what their state courts have to say about the issue. The basic rule then should be for all employers, private and public, not to discriminate nor retaliate against your employees.
Last 10 posts by Mark
- North Carolina Federal Minimum Wage Alert - June 11th, 2007
- New York Federal Minimum Wage Alert - June 11th, 2007
- Arizona Workers' Comp Compromise - June 11th, 2007
- New Mexico Federal Minimum Wage Alert - June 10th, 2007
- New Jersey Federal Minimum Wage Alert - June 10th, 2007
- Maine Leaving Wage Law Not Leaving - June 10th, 2007
- New York Family Leave Law Leaving? - June 10th, 2007
- New Hampshire Federal Minimum Wage Alert - June 10th, 2007
- Discrimination Law Suits Legal Case - June 10th, 2007
- Critics of Federal Minimum Wage Law - June 10th, 2007
RELATED LINKS
POPULAR POSTS
POPULAR TAGS
Regulations Employment Laws Employer Requirements Uniformed Services Employment Reemployment Rights Act Health and Safety Judicial Decisions Federal Minimum Wage Ohio Connecticut Equal Employment Opportunity Federal Labor Laws Workers with Disabilities California Human Resources Missouri Illinois Employee Benefits Compliance IssuesCATEGORIES
