It’s the Law: Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act or GINA
July 18th, 2008 Posted by AmeliaEvery employer should be aware of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act or GINA, which was signed into law by President Bush on May 21, 2008. This law makes it illegal to discriminate against employees in hiring, firing, job placement, promotion or other employment decisions based on an individual’s genetic profile.
According to Francis S. Collins, M.D., PhD., director of the Human Genome Research Institute, under GINA “No one will need to fear their DNA is going to be used against them.” Dr. Collins adds, “This law will protect everyone with DNA—and that is all of us.”
GINA also prohibits group health plans and insurers from denying coverage, or charging more for coverage based on an individual’s genetic predisposition to develop a disease – such as heart disease, Alzheimer’s or cancer – in the future. This portion of GINA covers only healthy individuals.
Senator Ted Kennedy, a Democrat from Massachusetts, has called GINA the “first major civil rights bill of the 21st century.”
While most scientists agree that mapping the human genome ranks with developing the polio vaccine and inventing electricity as an accomplishment, they also point out that it could be a double-edged sword. Genetic testing could help people identify their risk for certain types of cancer and other diseases, paving the way for improved treatments and preventative care.
However, many fear that genetic testing could also open the door for discrimination, in the workplace and in healthcare. GINA addresses those concerns.
While the scientific community applauds GINA, many Human Resources groups believe that the law is too broad and will spawn frivolous lawsuits.
As previously reported, on April 24 GINA was passed in the US Senate by a vote of 95 to 0. It was then sent to the House of Representatives where it passed by an overwhelming majority on May 1, 2008.
President George W. Bush signed GINA into law on May 21, 2008.
Under GINA, employers cannot legally ask employees for genetic information. Making employment decisions based on genetic information is illegal. These decisions include hiring, firing, promotions, pay, raises, benefits, training, status and working conditions.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act was first proposed more than 13 yeas ago, when there were fewer than 100 possible genetic tests. Today there are more than 1,200 genetic tests that are widely used for medical conditions including cancer, asthma, Alzheimer’s disease, and heart disease.
Critics have long feared that as genetic testing grows, healthcare providers and employers would use it as a way of weeding out employees who are at risk for serious – and expensive – medical conditions. A company that refused to hire workers who are genetically predisposed to cancer or heart disease, would save thousands of dollars – perhaps even millions of dollars – in employee health care benefits. This is especially true if the company is self-insured.
Some employees have refused to have genetic testing for breast cancer or other serious conditions, for fear that the information would be used against them in employment or health care opportunities. That fear is now eliminated. Discrimination based on genetic information has joined discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, age, pregnancy and disability as prohibited behavior.
A number of states already have laws that prohibit genetic discrimination in the workplace.
Last 10 posts by Amelia
- EEOC Updates Definition of ADA Disability - April 20th, 2011
- New Utah Immigration Law - April 15th, 2011
- Drunk Employees Not Protected by ADA - April 13th, 2011
- 18 States Consider Limits on Use of Credit Reports in Screening - March 30th, 2011
- California May Expand Employee Rights - March 18th, 2011
- New I-9 Handbook - March 4th, 2011
- Reporting Time Pay Varies By State - February 18th, 2011
- Inclement Weather and Payroll - February 9th, 2011
- Avoid Workplace Violence - February 4th, 2011
- Rhode Island Governor Repeals E-Verify - January 26th, 2011
RELATED LINKS
POPULAR POSTS
- Home page
- State Lunch and Break Law Governing Florida
- California Lunch and Break Law Regulations
- North Carolina Labor Law Board
- Arizona Labor Law Board
More Popular Posts- Illinois State Lunch and Break Law Requirements
- Ohio Lunch and Break Law Requirements
- Server Minimum Wage
- Holiday Pay Law Requirements in the State of California (CA)
- Texas Minimum Wage Increase
- State Lunch and Break Law Governing Texas
- State of Michigan Lunch and Break Law
- Georgia Lunch and Break Law Regulations
- Arizona Lunch and Break Law
- Florida (FL) Maternity Leave Law
POPULAR TAGS
CATEGORIES
AUTHORS
- Adrianne Dunne
- Alexandra Waldron
- Amelia Figueroa
- Ashley Crawford
- Bethany Stroh
- Cara Lawrence
- Christine Carter
- Derrick Lange
- Emily Richardson
- Hannah Dixon
- Heather Connors
- Jane Morgan
- Jared Franklin
- John Bellamy
- Jolie Beckett
- Justine Murchie
- Karen Husson
- Kimberly Matthews
- Lindsay Ross
- Madison Thomas
- Marilyn Walters
- Mark Hathaway
- Nicole Andrade
- Rachel Maguire
- Sarah Fitzgerald
- Savannah Case
- Susan Symthe
ARCHIVES
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
-
Additional Archives - December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- August 2003
- August 2002
- April 2002
- February 2002

Tags: act, Discrimination, federal, gene, genetic, GINA, human genome project, illegal, information, Kennedy, law, nondiscrimination, Ted