New 2009 Law Redefines Disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act
October 14th, 2008 Posted by AmeliaA number of employees, who were not disabled in 2008, will legally be considered disabled in 2009, without any change in their condition.
A new law signed by President Bush on September 25, 2008 includes major changes in employment law related to disabled employees. These changes, which are effective January 1, 2009, affect every employer who has an impaired worker, or may have one in the future.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Amendments Act of 2008 changes the definition of “disability” under the law. The new law overturns several Supreme Court decisions and rulings regarding EEOC regulations.
The definition of a disability continues to be an impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a record of such an impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. However, there are some major changes involving individuals who use mitigating measures, including drugs and aids.
The U.S. Supreme Court has gradually eroded the coverage of the Americans with Disabilities Act over the years by excluding individuals who use mitigating measures. The Supreme Court ruled that if an individual was not impaired when the mitigating measure was used, then the Americans with Disabilities Act did not apply to that person.
Suppose Todd’s left leg was amputated after a motorcycle accident. Todd would qualify as a disabled employee under the Americans with Disabilities Act. However, under the Supreme Court ruling, if Todd had an artificial leg and was able to walk and complete most normal functions with the artificial leg, he would not be entitled to protection under ADA.
This is an important distinction because, for example, Todd might not qualify for time off to have a new prosthesis fitted, under the Supreme Court’s version of the law.
The new ADA law changes that. Under the EEOC’s new guidelines, Todd’s impairment would be assessed without the use of mitigating measures like his prosthetic leg. Clearly, under the new guidelines, Todd is disabled, even if he can run marathons with his prosthesis.
There are two notable exceptions to the definition of a disability under the new law. Persons who use ordinary eyeglasses or contact lenses are not considered disabled under the law.
Last 10 posts by Amelia
- COBRA Subsidy Extended Again - March 5th, 2010
- New York Uniform, Meals and Lodging Rules - February 10th, 2010
- New York Non-Exempt Employee Rules - February 3rd, 2010
- New York Tipped Minimum Wage is $4.75 - January 27th, 2010
- Oklahoma Direct Deposit - January 20th, 2010
- 2010 Minimum Wage Recap - January 1st, 2010
- Vermont Minimum Wage 2010 is $8.06 - December 30th, 2009
- New GINA Regulations - December 23rd, 2009
- Kansas 2010 Minimum Wage Increases to $7.25 - December 9th, 2009
- 2010 Washington Minimum Wage is $8.55 - December 2nd, 2009
RELATED LINKS
POPULAR POSTS

Tags: 2009, ADA Amendments Act, ada law, ADA regulations, amendments, americans with disabilities, americans with disabilities act, Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008, artificial leg, changes, definition of disability, disablity, distinction, drugs and aids, EEOC, eeoc regulations, employment law, january 1, law changes, left leg, measures, motorcycle accident, new ADA, of 2008, president bush, prosthesis, prosthetic leg, supreme court, supreme court decisions, supreme court ruling