Oklahoma Gives Health Money To Businesses
June 9th, 2007 Posted by MarkAfter all this talk about health care prices going up and government plans to take away health care responsibilities from employers, it is a different theme to hear then about a state government that is going to give money to employers for health care expenses.
That is right. The state of Oklahoma recently passed a law that would make health care more affordable for everyone perhaps, according to my sources. The bill was just signed into law by the governor of Oklahoma, Gov. Brad Henry, a Democrat. There are actually two laws that the governor signed, both of which have to do with the costs of health care and ways to decrease it.
The first new law in Oklahoma is called SB 424, and it makes it so that it is easier for poorer residents of the state to get health care benefits from the state. Instead of having to be below the 185 percent of poverty line level in the state, no citizens can be less than 300 percent of the poverty line in terms of salary and get the state health care assistance when it comes to buying health care for their children.
The law is called the All Kids Act, and it provides a cheaper health care plan for parents through a private insurance plan. The overall costs of the plan will be about $4200 per year for a child. The parents, however, will only pay about one quarter of that, while the state and the federal government will pick up the rest of the tab. The new law is expected to give this new benefit to an additional 45,000 children about in the state. It will cost overall about $8.2 million over the course of the next three years, and will be paid through another form of tobacco tax on cigarettes and such.
It is the next law that all of us employers might be more interested in. This second law that Gov. Brad Henry signed directly affects how many employers in the state will do health care benefits going forward. What the new law will do is provide some form of subsidies for employers that give health care benefits to their employees. As with the previous health care related reform law, this employer helping bill will also get paid for by a tobacco tax in the state.
Some of the money will also come through a settlement that the state of Oklahoma got as part of the big tobacco settlements of the 1990s. in 1998 to be exact, the state of Oklahoma got about half of a million dollars from Big Tobacco for all of the cancer patients that could have come about in the state because of cigarettes and other tobacco products.
Not much more details on the new health care plan in Oklahoma were released by my source, as to whether or not all employers in the state will get this new health care insurance benefit subsidy, or whether only smaller employers in the state will get it and larger employers will need to keep paying for health care benefits on their own. And it is not entirely clear how much of a subsidy this new law will provide to whatever employers it is covering. But one thing is sure—it is a new form of health care reform that we have not really seen in other states, so in that regard, the state of Oklahoma is relatively innovative and should have a close eye on it, even if you are not an Oklahoma employer. The Sooner State could be providing an interesting example for the rest of us to follow.
Oklahoma Employee Benefit
May 10th, 2007 Posted by AmeliaIf you’re an employer with a health plan that includes mental health treatment, did you know that the caps on benefit amounts for that care cannot be lower than the limits on other medical care? A recent ruling has extended the Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA) until December 31, 2007.
The act will have a strong effect on Oklahoma employee benefit plans, and nationwide applies to 150 million employees. The ruling extending the law comes down from the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA).
The federal agency covers most businesses in the U.S. Its job is to guarantee that group insurance plans abide by laws controlling pensions and health plans. The MHPA became law in 1996, and since that time has been subject to five amendments extending it past its September 31, 2001 “sunset clause,” or expiration date.
Group health plans are not allowed to put lower limits on mental health coverage than they do for medical procedures, including surgery. Before passage of the original law, your company’s coverage plan could legally have a $250,000 limit on medical care benefits but a $15,000 limit on mental health treatments. Now the two must be equal – plans with the $250,000 medical limit must have the same $250,000 benefit limit on health care. Annual caps on benefits are covered also, with mental health coverage equal to the lifetime or annual ceiling on medical or surgical procedures.
What’s included under the category of mental health treatments? Stays in rehabilitation facilities, or “rehabs” for treatment of alcohol or drug dependency are covered, as are visits to mental health professionals – licensed therapists, psychiatrists, and psychologists. Also included are stays in the mental health section of a medical hospital, or in mental hospitals themselves, for illnesses like schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, and depression.
There is nothing in the law requiring you as an employer to have a mental health component in your group health insurance program. It requires instead that, if you already have mental health coverage, its benefit limits must be equal to those of your plan’s medical or surgical treatment coverage.
RELATED LINKS
POPULAR POSTS
POPULAR TAGS
CATEGORIES
AUTHORS
- Adrianne Dunne
- Alexandra Waldron
- Amelia Figueroa
- Ashley Crawford
- Bethany Stroh
- Cara Lawrence
- Christine Carter
- Derrick Lange
- Emily Richardson
- Hannah Dixon
- Heather Connors
- Jane Morgan
- Jared Franklin
- John Bellamy
- Jolie Beckett
- Justine Murchie
- Karen Husson
- Kimberly Matthews
- Lindsay Ross
- Madison Thomas
- Marilyn Walters
- Mark Hathaway
- Nicole Andrade
- Rachel Maguire
- Sarah Fitzgerald
- Savannah Case
- Susan Symthe
ARCHIVES
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
-
Additional Archives
