South Carolina Employee Benefit
May 29th, 2007 Posted by AmeliaEmployers may be confused as to the impact a recent ruling has on South Carolina employee benefit plans. This ruling was issued by the US Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) and impacts companies who have group health insurance plans that provide benefits for mental health treatments.
What is the significance of this ruling?
The ruling extends the expiration date on the Mental Health Parity Act, also known as MHPA. This act has been a law since 1996. Originally, it was to expire on September 30, 2001, but it has been extended 5 times. The new expiration date is December, 31, 2007.
What impact does the Mental Health Parity Act have?
The Mental Health Parity Act requires that group health insurance plans have the same benefit caps for mental heath treatments that they have for surgery and other medical treatments. Before this act, insurance companies could legally have a lifetime benefit maximum for mental health treatments of $15,000 while they had a lifetime benefit maximum for surgery and other health treatments of $250,000.
Is the yearly benefit maximum affected as well?
Yes. The Mental Health Parity Act requires that both the lifetime benefit maximum and the yearly benefit maximum be the same for both health treatments and mental health treatments.
What mental heath treatments are included?
The mental health treatments covered can include visits to psychologists, psychiatrists, or licensed therapists. In addition, rehab stints for alcohol or drug dependency can be covered. Stays in mental hospitals for conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and depression may also be covered.
Do companies that currently do not cover mental heath treatments have to provide this coverage?
No. This law does not impact companies that currently have group health insurance plans that do not cover mental health treatments. The law only applies to group health insurance plans that do cover mental health treatments.
South Carolina Employee Benefit
May 22nd, 2007 Posted by AmeliaA ruling with an impact on 150 million employees in the U.S. has extended the Mental Health Parity Act.
The act was extended to the last day of 2007 through a law signed by the President that will continue to guarantee equal health insurance coverage for mental health as for physical health treatment.
South Carolina employee benefit plans will be affected by the extension. Thanks to the Mental Health Parity Act, or MHPA, it is illegal for group health insurance plans covering workers to put ceilings on coverage for mental health treatments at levels lower than those for medical and surgical treatments.
Mental health treatments covered are stays in psychiatric centers (mental hospitals) or the mental health sections of medical hospitals for treatments of illnesses including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, or schizophrenia. It also includes visits to mental health professionals such as psychologists, licensed therapists, or psychiatrists. Stays in “rehab” for drug and alcohol abuse are covered.
When the law was first passed in 1996, a “sunset clause” was written in, requiring that it expire on September 31, 2001. Five amendments since that time have extended the date of expiration.
Before the enactment of MHPA, limits on mental health plan coverage might much lower than corresponding limits on surgical or medical treatment coverage. Any such disparity is illegal under MHPA. In short, group health plans must pay for mental health coverage to the same degree they cover medical care.
Because 150 million U.S. employees are covered by group health plans, the MHPA – and its recent extension – have a broad impact on the workforce.
The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) enforces the laws regulating group health plans. It has gone through a metamorphosis since its creation in 1974. At that time its mission was to enforce the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974. Since then it has undergone several name changes, until its present title reflected its broader mandate and its upgrade to sub-cabinet level.
RELATED LINKS
POPULAR POSTS
POPULAR TAGS
CATEGORIES
AUTHORS
- Adrianne Dunne
- Alexandra Waldron
- Amelia Figueroa
- Ashley Crawford
- Bethany Stroh
- Cara Lawrence
- Christine Carter
- Derrick Lange
- Emily Richardson
- Hannah Dixon
- Heather Connors
- Jane Morgan
- Jared Franklin
- John Bellamy
- Jolie Beckett
- Justine Murchie
- Karen Husson
- Kimberly Matthews
- Lindsay Ross
- Madison Thomas
- Marilyn Walters
- Mark Hathaway
- Nicole Andrade
- Rachel Maguire
- Sarah Fitzgerald
- Savannah Case
- Susan Symthe
ARCHIVES
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
-
Additional Archives
