Unintentionally (or Intentionally) Misclassifying Independent Contractors is Too Risky

March 28th, 2012 Posted by admin

Hiring Independent Contractors is a legitimate model in all states, and true Independent Contractors should receive 1099s for compensation for their services. However, many employers give 1099 forms to people who are misclassified as Independent Contractors when they should have been paid as employees.

Sometimes the employer’s motive is honest – they believe that the worker is truly an Independent ; but more commonly, they pay with a 1099 to keep the overhead cost down and not give the the true protection they need for their work.

The basic definition of the “Employee” and the “Independent Contractor” as given by the Employment Development Department (EDD) of California is as follows:

  • Employee: An individual who performs services for you and is subject to your control regarding what will be done and how it will be done.
  • Independent Contractor: An individual who performs services for you, but you control only the result of the work.

The employer must understand these definitions in order to remain in compliance and not be issued all the fines and penalties.

The IRS, Department of Labor, and many state agencies are taking aim at businesses using Independent Contractors due to the suffering tax revenues everywhere. Paying Independent Contractors with a 1099 eliminates wage withholding, employment taxes, unemployment taxes, worker’s compensation, and offers no pensions and fringe benefits to the worker. The employer may be benefitting now, but the ramifications can be outstanding.

If found guilty of misclassifying workers, the employer will be faced with costly audits by the IRS, EDD, and Department of Industrial Relations, additional taxes, penalties, and interest, plus revocation of state/local license.

The state of California passed a Labor Law in October 2011 designed to crack down on the misclassification of workers as Independent Contractors and dramatically increased the penalties on employers who have been found to have willfully done so. The SB 459 added the following fines:

  • California’s Labor and Workforce Development Agency can fine you for “willfully misclassifying” an employee from $5,000 to $15,000 per violation.
  • The penalty goes up to $25,000 per violation if you commit a “pattern and practice” of “willfully misclassifying” workers.
  • There’s joint and several liability for consultants (but excluding practicing lawyers) who advise employers on such independent contractor engagements.
  • It’s unlawful to charge misclassified independent contractors any fee or take deductions from the compensation paid to them.  Companies cannot deduct fees for goods, materials, space rental, services, government licenses, repairs, etc. provided to contractors who are reclassified.

Paying a true employee with a 1099 and misclassifying them as Independent Contractor may lower the overhead costs now, but should the relationship be terminated, or competitors start to ask questions – both may contact the EDD or the IRS, and the truth will be revealed. The employer will be left having to pay an enormous amount of taxes, fines, and penalties.

The cost is not worth the risk. Be informed of the regulations and the law. Be in compliance at all times for your business.

Resources:

Forms:

DE 231, Information Sheet – Employment

DE 231EEE, Information Sheet – Exempt Employment

DE 38, Employment Determination Guide

DE 1870, Determination of Employment Work Status

Additional Resources:

Employment Status Course

www.edd.ca.gov/Payroll_Taxes/Web_Based_Seminars.htm

Employee or Independent Contractor Tax Seminar

www.edd.ca.gov/Payroll_Tax_Serminars/



No Comments >> Posted in California,California,California,California,Compensation,Compliance Issues,Employee Benefits,Employment Laws,Insurance Benefits,Labor and Employment,Unemployment Insurance,Worker's Compensation
Tags: , ,

HR Compliance

September 13th, 2006 Posted by Amelia

HR compliance is more important than ever, with recent news that the U.S. Department of Labor filed suit against a Houston employer for not keeping adequate records of time worked, including weekly time sheets. U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao wants to send a clear message to employers that violations of labor rights will not be tolerated.

“To protect workers, last year the department deployed additional investigators to the Gulf Coast region to better ensure that employers fully comply with wage and hour laws,” said US Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao. “This legal action is among our many efforts on behalf of these workers who are doing vital work for the Gulf Coast region’s recovery and who deserve and are entitled to receive all the wages they have earned.”

While busy employers may think of HR compliance as a minor matter, to the Department of Labor, violations are a serious offense. The recent suit filed by the U.S. Labor Department confirms Secretary Chao’s caution against employers who violate labor rights. The suit, to recover over $500,000 in back wages for employees working on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, alleges that the employer committed violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) filed the suit against a Houston drywall firm for violating the labor rights of employees. Specifically, the employer misclassified employees as independent contractors, in order to avoid overtime payments mandated under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FSLA).

The drywall company performed on contracts for reconstruction along the Mississippi Gulf Coast. The WHD investigation of the Beau Rivage Hotel and Casino contract in Biloxi, Miss. and other worksites, found that the company owner regularly misclassified employees as independent contractors and failed to pay them the additional half time overtime premium for hours worked over 40 in a workweek. The company also failed to maintain accurate records of employees’ wages and hours of work.

2 Comments >> Posted in California,Compensation,Georgia,Human Resources,Louisiana,Mississippi,Texas