labor lawAdivision of labor law center

 After more than 15 months  of debate, the E-Verify mandate for federal contractors went into effect on September 8, 2009. The regulation also applies to most sub-contractors working on federal projects.

The new regulations apply to any business that signs or renews a federal contract worth $100,000 or more, on or after September 8, 2009. Federal contractors are also required to ensure that any sub-contractor they hire complies with the E-Verify regulations, which adds another layer of administration for many employers.

Employers may think they are covered because they already use E-Verify for all new hires, but they will be mistaken. The new regulations require employers to enroll anew in E-Verify, designating their business as a federal contractor.

A unique feature of the system is that employers must verify the work authorization of existing employees working on federal projects, as well as new hire. This means that even an employee who has been with the company for 50 years must prove that he or she is legally authorized to work in the U.S.

In a business where a single employee may handle varied tasks, it can be difficult to determine who is and is not working on a particular federal contract. In that case, the employer can verify the work authorization status of all existing employees.

However, if an employer chose to verify the work authorization status of only Hispanic employees, or only those who were non-citizens, that would be illegal discrimination based on race, color or national ancestry. The employer must re-verify all employees, or only those working on federal projects.

As part of the DHS E-Verify system, an employer can require that an employee or new hire who is a citizen use a Social Security card as one of the identity documents required on the I-9. Employers who do not use E-Verify still cannot dictate which identity documents an employee chooses to use, from the list provided on the I-9 form.

During July, both the U.S. House and Senate took measures that would require more employers to use E-Verify, including federal contractors and companies that benefit from federal stimulus spending.

The U.S. Senate passed an amendment to the 2010 Department of Homeland Security budget sponsored by Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, which will require federal contractors to use E-Verify, and extend that program for three more years.

According to Senator Sessions, this amendment will prevent illegal immigrants from being hired for construction projects funded by the federal stimulus packages. A similar bill was introduced in the House of Representatives.

The Society for Human Resource Management or SHRM has long opposed the mandatory use of E-Verify. SHRM argues that a biometric component such as fingerprints or retinal scan needs to be added to E-Verify. The problem is identity theft. Suppose a new employee presents documents for E-Verify as “John Turner”. E-Verify can check that John Turner can legally work in the U.S. However, there is no way for E-Verify to determine if the person presenting those documents is actually John Turner or not. SHRM and New York Senator Charles Schumer argue that E-Verify should not be used until the system can authenticate identity. Opponents claim that such a biometric system would be a violation of privacy.

While a number of states require employers to use E-Verify, federal contractors are still in limbo. In 2008, President George W. Bush signed an executive order that would have required federal contractors to implement E-Verify. However, it has been delayed and is currently being challenged in court by SHRM and other employer groups.

Nevertheless, many employers continue to voluntarily adopt the E-Verify system. E-Verify compares information provided by the (more…)

Every employer should have begun using the new, updated I-9 form no later than April 3, 2009.

The biggest difference in the new I-9 form and the previous version is that expired identity documents will no longer be accepted on the new form.

The USCIS or Citizenship and Immigration Services notes that the Department of Homeland Security wanted to ensure that “documents presented for use in the Form I-9 process must be valid and reliably establish both identity and employment authorization.” The DHS adds that expired documents may not contain the workers valid status. They are also more prone to tampering and fraudulent use, than unexpired documents.

The new I-9 form also eliminates several documents from List A, items that establish both identity and employment authorization. These include Forms I-688, I-688A and I-688B, temporary resident cards and outdated employment authorization cards.

The newest I-9 form also adds a number of documents to List A, including: (more…)

A new I-9 form for employers has been developed. Otherwise known as the employment eligibility form, the I-9 form’s revised version is effective April 3, 2009.

At that time, all employers in the U.S. will be legally bound to use the new version.

Any such employers who wish to do so are invited to comment. It should be noted that many firms have already begun switching over to the new forms. Compliance is not mandatory yet, however. As in the past, employers may legally make copies of I-9 documentation, but must file such documentation in a location separate from a worker’s personnel file.

The deadline date represents a delay in the date originally put forward by the U.S. Citizenship and immigration Services following action under the Bush administration.

As a result of efforts by, among others, the new White House under President Barack Obama, the deadline was moved back from February 2, 2009.

Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel sent memos to federal agencies urging them to (more…)