labor lawAdivision of labor law center

 Massachusetts recently increased the penalties for employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors.

Many states are imposing stricter penalties for employers who illegally avoid paying unemployment insurance and workers’ comp by misclassifying workers as independent contractors.

In Somers v. Converged Access, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the independent contractor law is a strict liability  statute. This means that the employer’s intent in misclassifying a worker is irrelevant. Therefore, the worker was entitled to compensation for wages, overtime and benefits that he would have received, if he had been correctly classified as an employee. In addition, the employee was permitted to keep the $65 per hour that the company paid him as an independent contractor – an amount far in excess of an employee’s wage in the same job.

The Massachusetts company was required to pay the employee for benefits including vacation and holiday pay. In addition, the company was ordered to pay the employee overtime at a rate of $97.50 per hour – 1.5 times the worker’s $65-per-hour wage.  

The Massachusetts definition of independent contractor is even more strict than federal independent contractor regulations. A worker is an employee unless he or she is: (more…)

The federal EEOC just published new regulations that redefine disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The new regulations specifically address the definition of disability within the ADAAA of 2008, which has been in effect since January 1, 2009.

Under the new rule, certain impairments will create a presumption of disability. These impairments include epilepsy, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, developmental disabilities, deafness, blindness, use of a wheelchair due to mobility problems, autism, cerebral palsy, HIV/AIDS, muscular dystrophy, major depression, bipolar disorder, partial or complete amputations, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia.

The new ADA rules mean that an employee who has been diagnosed with any of those conditions is presumed to be disabled and entitled to reasonable accommodation.

This may seem to be a common-sense approach to disabilities, but it has not always been so.

Under the old rules, each employee claiming a disability had to individually demonstrate that the condition limited one or more major life activities. A very large company might have 10 blind employees. Each blind employee would have to individually prove that blindness impaired their performance at one or more major life activities like reading, walking, using a phone book, using public transportation, cooking, shopping, personal grooming, etc.

An individualized assessment of whether a substantial limitation exists should still be done, according to the EEOC. However, the federal agency claims this “can be done very quickly and easily with respect to these types of impairments, and will consistently result in a finding of disability.”

Employers should note that the list of impairments is not exhaustive. Other conditions (more…)

Employers throughout the U.S. are carefully watching what is happening these days in the District of Columbia.

D.C. has approved a controversial new act known as the Accrued Sick and Safe Leave Act of 2008, which essentially requires employers to provide paid sick leave to their workers. The act may be the harbinger of paid sick leave elsewhere, and has become an important topic among HR professionals.

Employees who would be eligible are those who, first of all, spend at least 50% of their work time in the District of Columbia. They must also have accumulated a year of continuous service and at least 1,000 hours of work in the previous 12 months, under the proposed act.

The new law is quite broad. Employers would be required to give paid sick leave to any of these eligible employees for any absences connected with (more…)

Under new regulations issued by the Oregon BOLI or Bureau of Labor and Industries, food servers can opt to waive their unpaid meal breaks, but not their paid rest breaks.

Tipped Oregon food service workers over the age of 18 may opt out of their required 30-minute meal breaks if they like. The employee must complete a waiver form, available in English or Spanish from the BOLI website.

Employers cannot require an employee to waive breaks, or coerce employees to do so under the new regulations. Either the employer or the employee can revoke the waiver at any time by written notice.

However, if the employer has a signed, non-revoked waiver on file, the employee (more…)

The new FMLA regulations go into effect on January 16, 2009.

In a key change, the FMLA regulation for Continuing Treatment, Section 825.115, defines a “serious health condition.”  The FMLA permits employees to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave for a serious health condition. During that period, the employees’ benefits, including their group health insurance, must continue on the same basis as before. After the leave, the employee must be returned to his or her job. (more…)